Saskatchewan Pharmacy Law JE Practice Exam

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

1 / 400

Under what condition may the sale of a Class A opioid not require a warning sticker and patient information handout?

If the opioid is administered by a pharmacist

If the sale is to a pharmacy

If the opioid will be administered under the supervision of a practitioner

The rationale behind the condition where the sale of a Class A opioid may not require a warning sticker and patient information handout is based on the context of administration and supervision. When an opioid is being sold with the understanding that it will be administered under the supervision of a qualified practitioner, the need for additional materials is lessened. This is because the practitioner is in a position to provide direct oversight and guidance to the patient regarding the use of the opioid, including its risks and benefits. The professional setting typically ensures that the patient receives the necessary information through direct communication rather than requiring printed materials.

In cases where the drug is administered by a pharmacist or where the sale is to a pharmacy or licensed pharmacy without the implication of patient interaction, it may not align with the necessary guidance that comes with the direct physician oversight. Thus, the supervision by a practitioner, which covers the responsibilities of patient education and safety, stands as the key reason why a warning sticker and patient information handout can be omitted in this scenario.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

If the sale is to a licensed pharmacy only

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy